Reform Immigration For America » anti-immigrant

Update: Judge releases rulings on Alabama’s anti-immigration law

Allie — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:53:17 +0000

This afternoon, following a temporary block of enforcement, a judge announced the rulings on Alabama’s notorious anti-immigrant law. Today’s rulings uphold some of the most alarming parts of the law. US District Judge Sharon Blackburn ruled that “federal law doesn’t prohibit the state from requiring schools to check the immigration status of students or from requiring police to determine the status of suspected illegal immigrants.”

According to the AP, Judge Blackburn temporarily blocked four parts of the law until she can issue a final ruling. Those measures would:

Make it a crime for an undocumented immigrant to solicit work.

Make it a crime to provide transportation or housing to an undocumented immigrant.

Allow discrimination lawsuits against companies that dismiss workers while hiring undocumented immigrants.

Prohibit businesses from taking tax deductions for wages paid to undocumented workers.

One of the harshest provisions that sets HB56 apart from other anti-immigrant state bills is the requirement that all schools must verify the status of children attending schools. This portion of the bill is being challenged in another case which will be decided this afternoon.

There is still news and analysis coming out on this ruling, and we will continue to update on the blog as more information is available. Stay tuned.

EDIT: More analysis from our allies at America’s Voice.

More analysis via CNN, and Governor Bentley’s response to fight for full implementation, according to a local CBS station.

EDIT: Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM) released a statement on the announcement, saying, “This law will do nothing to create fair immigration laws. Congress must act now to fix the immigration system before more states follow Alabama’s terrible example.”

Enforcement of Alabama Immigration Law Temporarily Blocked

Nicole — Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:37:35 +0000

This week, a judge has moved to temporarily block enforcement of Alabama’s notorious anti-immigrant law. The law is opposed by the Obama administration, church leaders and immigrant-rights groups.

Originally scheduled to take effect Thursday, the law, if enforced, would deter children’s access to public schools by requiring school officials to verify the immigration status of children, criminalize residents for ordinary, everyday interactions with undocumented individuals, and authorize police to demand “papers” demonstrating immigration status during traffic stops.

The AP reported:

The brief order by U.S. District Judge Sharon L. Blackburn means the law – which opponents and supporters alike have called the toughest in the nation – won’t take effect as scheduled on Thursday. The ruling was cheered both by Republican leaders who were pleased the judge didn’t gut the law and by opponents who compare it to old Jim Crow-era statutes against racial integration.

Blackburn didn’t address whether the law is constitutional, and she could still let all or parts of the law take effect later. Instead, she said she needed more time to consider lawsuits filed by the Justice Department, private groups and individuals that claim the state is overstepping its bounds.

Indeed this temporary stay gives hope and some relief to the immigrant rights community in Alabama. Thank you to the National Immigrant Law Center who joined the ACLU and the Southern Poverty Law Center in suing the state, for their hard work in fighting this tremendously horrible law. If enforced, the law will do nothing to decrease immigration and only criminalize parents and the police.

Anti-Immigrant Groups: A Chorus of Intolerance

Rachel LaBruyere — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:23:44 +0000

From Maribel Hastings’ blog.

The third article in the series “Immigration Reform: Know the Players”

While Congressman Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) has called supporters of immigration reform to participate in a national conversation on November 18th, the anti-immigrant organization Americans for Legal Immigration (ALIPAC) is holding “Tea Party” protests in various states this Saturday.

With all the noise they make and the fear they inspire in Congress, one might assume the protestors numbered in the millions — but ALIPAC’s website lists, as of today, 52 planned “tea parties” and around 4,500 people anticipated to attend.

Nevertheless, anti-immigrant groups remain a stumbling block for immigration reform — and an opponent against whom supporters have to stay on guard.

This sector includes organizations, movements and institutions that range from extremist neo-Nazi groups to respected Washington, D.C.-based think tanks. There are also the legislators who often seem to be spokespeople for these organizations, some of whom make up the House of Representatives’ Immigration Reform Caucus, composed of 88 Republican and 5 Democratic members of Congress.

William Gheen, founder of ALIPAC, says that he hopes that the events of this Saturday “combined with our lobying [sic] efforts and support for campaigns will stop these attempts to destroy America through mass illegal immigration and amnesty.”

Their efforts

In 2006, when the Sensenbrenner proposal — which would have criminalized undocumented immigrants — sparked massive marches and protests, the anti-immigrant movement found itself caught off guard and could only muster a feeble response.

But when debate over reform began in the Senate in 2007, they had organized themselves to use the Internet effectively, and orchestrated massive campaigns to call and email Congressional offices.

They also forged tacit alliances with ultraconservative radio and television talk-show hosts, who continue to support them, and with so-called “journalists.”

As of today, at least, one fewer legitimate media outlet will be providing a platform for anti-immigrant views. Last night, Lou Dobbs announced his resignation from the channel–effective immediately. His departure came after months of pressure from a national coalition urging CNN to “Drop Dobbs” for disseminating lies and stereotypes about immigrants and Latinos. For years, Dobbs used his program as a bully pulpit to attack the idea of comprehensive immigration reform.

Their current status

After taking credit for the defeat of immigration reform in 2007, the anti-immigrant movement saw the rise of Barack Obama — a Democrat, an African-American, the son of an immigrant father, and a supporter of immigration reform — to the presidency in 2008. Furthermore, they saw the majority of their candidates in federal, state and local elections go down in defeat.

But Obama’s public-opinion “honeymoon” is over and immigration opponents are hoping to exploit the economic crisis, the spectacle of this summer’s health-care reform “town halls,” and divisions among Democrats to revive their agenda.

Accusations of racism

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a civil rights advocacy group, the core of the anti-immigrant movement is interconnected–funded by a single source.

In its report “The Nativist Lobby: Three Faces of Intolerance,” the SPLC reports that the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and NumbersUSA were all created by restrictionist John Tanton, who has been linked to the Pioneer Fund, an institution that has conducted studies designed to prove the superiority of the white race.

According to SPLC’s Mark Potok, FAIR is the lobbying arm of the anti-immigrant movement; CIS is the “independent” think tank; and NumbersUSA organizes the base.

2009, a different story

The immigration opponents boast they’re ready for the battle of 2010. Their argument: With 16 million people unemployed across the country, “Americans will never accept another amnesty.”

But Rich Stolz, director of the national Reform Immigration for America campaign, points out that this time, advocates for immigration reform are ready to neutralize their attacks, drawing on the political power that Latinos and immigrant communities demonstrated in the 2008 elections.

“The campaign is gaining momentum and is active across the country in ways that would never have been possible before,” says Stolz.

Ali Noorani, director of the National Immigration Forum, concurs that this time there are more allies of reform ready to implement a three-prong strategy: “mobilize the base, win the middle, and marginalize the opposition.”

“Never before have we been able to do so much and engage so many allies. We have an incredible amount of work ahead, but we’re confident,” says Noorani.

Rafael Prieto Zartha contributed to this article.